GST Vidhi | GST Advance Ruling


Global Reach Education Services Pvt Ltd Vs. West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR)

Promotional & Enrolment of Students Services provided to foreign universities are considered as “export of services” under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act & Taxable under GST

Ruling Authority: West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAR)

Case Number: 05 of 2018               Date of Order: 02 /WBAAR/ 2017-18

Applicant: Global Reach Education Services Pvt Ltd

 

Summary of Case: Global Reach Education Services Pvt Ltd provides promotional services for foreign universities to prospective students in India. They receive consideration in convertible foreign exchange. The applicant sought clarification on whether these services should be classified as "export of services" under Section 2(6) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act), thereby qualifying for a zero-rated supply under the CGST/WBGST Act 2017.

Relevant Sections:

·       Section 2(6) of the IGST Act: Defines "export of services."

·       Section 13(2) of the IGST Act: Specifies the place of supply of services for export.

·       Section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act: Determines the place of supply for intermediary services.

·       Section 97(2)(e) of the GST Act: Allows for advance rulings on the classification of services.

Questions Raised by the Applicant:

1.    Whether the services provided to foreign universities are considered as “export of services” under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act?

2.    If the services qualify as an export, would they be zero-rated under the GST Act?


Submission by Applicant:

·       The applicant argued that it is providing a direct promotional service rather than acting as an intermediary.

·       The applicant receives payment in convertible foreign exchange from foreign universities.

·       The service recipient (foreign university) is outside India, and the place of supply of the services is also outside India according to Section 13(2) of the IGST Act.

·       The applicant contended that it should not be classified as an intermediary service and, hence, its services should qualify as an export under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act.

 

Findings by Authority:

·       The Authority found that despite the applicant’s argument, the primary service provided is facilitating the recruitment/enrollment of students to foreign universities, with promotional activities being ancillary.

·       The agreements reviewed show that the applicant is compensated based on recruitment performance, indicating that the principal service is recruitment facilitation, not merely promotional.

·       The applicant's role, as outlined in the agreements, aligns with that of an intermediary or recruitment agent rather than an independent service provider.

 

Final Ruling:

·       The services provided by the applicant do not qualify as "Export of Services" under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act.

·       The services are considered taxable under the GST Act.

·       This ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103(2) until and unless declared void under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here