GST Vidhi | GST Advance Ruling


M/s Hindustan Zinc Limited Vs Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling, GST (RAJ/AAR/2024-25/24)

Admissibility of Input Tax Credit on Goods and Services for Tailing Dam Construction under GST

By Yogesh Verma (CS/LLB) / 2 min read / GST Advance Ruling

Name of the Party: M/s Hindustan Zinc Limited

Name of the Ruling Authority: Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling, GST

Ruling No.: RAJ/AAR/2024-25/24

Date of Ruling: 03.01.2025

Summary of Ruling:

  • The applicant sought an advance ruling on the availability of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on goods and services used for increasing the height of the tailing dam under Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017.
  • The authority ruled that the tailing dam qualifies as an immovable property and does not fall under "Plant and Machinery," making ITC ineligible for such expenses.

Facts of Advance Ruling:

  • Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (HZL) is engaged in mining and processing of metals such as zinc, lead, and silver.
  • The process generates hazardous waste (tailings), which must be disposed of in a legally compliant manner.
  • HZL constructs and raises the height of tailing dams to manage this waste, using materials like rocks, mud, sand, and HDPE sheets.
  • They capitalized these expenses and claimed ITC, arguing that the dam is an integral part of the milling plant and qualifies as "Plant and Machinery."

Question Raised:

  • Whether ITC is available on goods and services used for increasing the height of the Tailing Dam under Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017?

Submission Made by Applicant:

  • The tailing dam is an integral part of the milling plant, essential for mining operations.
  • It should be classified as "Plant and Machinery," making ITC eligible.
  • Without the dam, mining activities cannot continue, and environmental laws mandate its maintenance.
  • The dam consists of automated pipelines, drainage systems, and geomembranes, making it an "apparatus" rather than a civil structure.
  • Several legal precedents were cited to justify the ITC claim.

Relevant Sections:

  • Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the CGST Act, 2017, which restrict ITC for construction of immovable property unless classified as "Plant and Machinery."
  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, which mandates safe disposal of tailings.

Discussion and Finding of Ruling Authority:

  • The authority determined that the tailing dam is an immovable property and does not qualify as "Plant and Machinery."
  • The materials used, such as cement and HDPE sheets, contribute to its classification as a civil structure.
  • The authority rejected the reliance on functionality test and previous judgments, stating that the dam serves an environmental compliance role rather than a direct business function.
  • The recent Supreme Court judgment in Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. was reviewed but was not found applicable in this case.

Final Ruling and Conclusion:

The Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling concluded that ITC is not available for goods and services used in increasing the height of the tailing dam, as it falls under immovable property under Section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here