GST Vidhi | GST Advance Ruling


M/s. PPD Pharmaceutical Development India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) (Ruling No.: GST-ARA-94/2022-23/B-13 / Date of Ruling: 30.04.2025)

ITC On Free Sample / GST ITC Denied on Free Sample Drug Imports for Clinical Trials: Maharashtra AAR Rules Against PPD Pharma

Introduction: The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), in a key decision impacting clinical research organizations, has ruled that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be availed by M/s PPD Pharmaceutical Development India Pvt. Ltd. on sample drugs imported for clinical trials, nor on related Customs House Agent (CHA) services, because the goods are supplied free of cost to hospitals, thus classified as free samples under Section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Case Details

  • Applicant: M/s. PPD Pharmaceutical Development India Pvt. Ltd.
  • GSTIN: 27AADCP2043E1ZT
  • Ruling No.: GST-ARA-94/2022-23/B-13
  • Date of Ruling: 30.04.2025

Background of the Case

PPD Pharmaceutical is an Indian arm of a global clinical research organization engaged in monitoring and managing clinical trials in India for overseas sponsors. These trials use sample drugs imported from foreign sponsors and shipped to hospitals across India.

The applicant sought advance ruling on whether it could claim ITC on IGST paid on imports and GST on services of CHA and logistic providers, especially when the sample drugs are provided free of cost to hospitals.

Questions Raised

1.    Whether the applicant is entitled to ITC of IGST paid on import of sample drugs under Section 16(1) of the CGST Act?

2.    Whether the applicant can claim ITC of IGST paid under DDP model of import where the applicant is the importer on record?

3.    Whether ITC of CGST paid on CHA services is allowed?

Applicant's Arguments

  • The sample drugs are essential for conducting clinical trials and form part of their taxable output services.
  • The import bills of entry are in the name of the applicant; hence IGST qualifies as “input tax”.
  • CHA services are also part of the procurement and should be treated as used in the course or furtherance of business.
  • Relied on case laws including Kardex India, Umax Packaging, Cadila Healthcare, and Alkem Laboratories, which permitted ITC on inputs and input services used in clinical research or manufacturing trial batches.

Jurisdictional Officer's Objection

  • Cited Section 17(5)(h) which blocks ITC on goods disposed of by way of gift or free samples.
  • Highlighted CBIC Circular No. 92/11/2019-GST (dated 07.03.2019) which clarifies that ITC on free samples is disallowed.
  • Since no consideration is received from hospitals and no invoice is issued, the distribution of drugs is treated as non-supply, and hence ITC cannot be claimed.

Authority’s Findings and Observations

On IGST Paid by Applicant (Q1)

  • Though section 16(1) allows ITC for goods used in business, section 17(5)(h) prevails due to its non-obstante clause.
  • Sample drugs are imported and delivered free of cost to clinics; thus, they fall under the category of free samples.
  • Hence, ITC is not available for such imported goods, even if used in providing taxable services later.

On IGST Paid by Logistics Provider Under DDP (Q2)

  • Even under the Delivered Duty Paid (DDP) model, the applicant remains the importer on record.
  • But since the sample drugs are again delivered without consideration, the disallowance under Section 17(5)(h) applies.
  • Therefore, ITC is not available, even if customs duty/IGST is paid by the logistics provider.

On CHA and Logistics Services (Q3)

  • These services relate to importing and transporting goods that are ultimately given free of cost.
  • Since these are used in connection with free samples, ITC on these input services is also blocked under Section 17(5)(h).
  • Cited West Bengal AAR in Indian Oil case and CBIC Circular confirming ineligibility.

Final Ruling

Question

AAR Ruling

Q1: ITC on IGST paid on sample drug imports by applicant?

Not allowed – classified as free samples

Q2: ITC on IGST under DDP model (logistics pays duty)?

Not allowed – drugs supplied free of cost

Q3: ITC on GST paid for CHA/logistics services?

Not allowed – input services tied to ineligible free supplies

 

Legal Basis of Rejection

  • Section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act: Bars ITC on goods disposed of by way of gift or free samples.
  • CBIC Circular No. 92/11/2019: Reinforces that such distributions are not supplies and hence, do not qualify for ITC.
  • No commercial invoice or consideration between applicant and hospitals → violates basic supply condition under Section 7 of the Act.

Conclusion

This ruling sets a precedent with wide implications for clinical research and pharmaceutical companies involved in sample imports. It clarifies that:

  • Merely using goods for business purposes is not enough — if goods are disposed of without consideration, ITC is blocked.
  • Input services like CHA and transport, even though directly linked to the import, also lose ITC eligibility when tied to free samples.

Businesses must ensure:

  • Supplies are not classified as gifts or free samples, or
  • They structure agreements to ensure consideration and invoicing, where possible, to preserve ITC entitlement.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular advisory and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.

Find the Attachment (Press on Click Here )


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here