GST Vidhi | GST Advance Ruling


M/s Shri Keshav Cement and Infra Ltd. Vs Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), Karnataka (AAR No. KAR ADRG 26/2019)

Input Tax Credit on Captive Solar Power Plant: M/s Shri Keshav Cement and Infra Ltd.

Background of the Case

M/s Shri Keshav Cement and Infra Ltd., a public limited company registered in Karnataka, is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of cement. The company operates two cement plants located at Lokapur and Kaladgi in Bagalkot district. To meet its electricity requirements, the company installed a 20 MW captive solar power plant at Bisarahalli in Koppal district. This solar power plant is exclusively used to generate electricity for captive consumption at the cement manufacturing units. Electricity from the solar plant is transmitted to these units through the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL) grid, under a “Wheeling and Banking” (W&B) agreement.

The applicant approached the Authority for Advance Ruling seeking clarity on the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on goods, capital goods, and input services used in the erection and commissioning of the solar power plant.

·       AAR No. KAR ADRG 26/2019

·       Date: 12th September 2019

·       Court: Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), Karnataka

·       Applicant: M/s Shri Keshav Cement and Infra Ltd.

 

Key Questions Before the Authority

1.    Eligibility of ITC on goods, capital goods, and input services used for the solar plant under Sections 16 and 17 of the CGST/KGST/IGST Acts.

2.    Whether full ITC is allowed on inputs and capital goods used in the solar plant when the electricity is transmitted to cement plants located at different places but under the same GST registration.

3.    Whether reversal of ITC is required on surplus electricity banked with the grid and unutilized at the end of six months, which is deemed to be consumed by KPTCL, GESCOM, or HESCOM.

Submission by the Applicant

  • The applicant argued that electricity is an essential input for the manufacture of cement and that the solar power plant was set up purely for captive consumption.
  • They contended that:
    • The solar power plant forms part of the plant and machinery used in the business.
    • Input goods and services used for setting up the solar plant are eligible for ITC under Section 16.
    • Section 17(5) does not restrict ITC as the plant qualifies as ‘plant and machinery’.
    • The electricity produced is not sold, but fully consumed for manufacturing taxable output (cement).
  • They relied on the decision of the Madras High Court in Thiagarajar Mills (P) Ltd (2018) which held that energy generated at a different location and used in the factory is eligible for ITC.

Revenue’s Observations

The authority noted:

  • Electricity qualifies as goods under Tariff Heading 27160000 and is also an input as per Section 2(59) of CGST Act.
  • ITC eligibility depends on whether:
    • The goods are capitalized in books (capital goods vs. inputs),
    • The goods qualify as “plant and machinery” fixed to earth (per Explanation to Section 17),
    • The energy generated is fully captively consumed (vs. partly supplied to the grid).

Findings and Ruling of the Authority

Question 1: Eligibility of ITC on Inputs / Capital Goods

  • Held: ITC is available only on those goods which are not capitalized, unless they qualify as plant and machinery.
  • Plant and machinery must be equipment or machinery fixed to earth by foundation or structural support and used for outward supply of goods or services.
  • Civil structures, buildings, and pipelines laid outside the factory do not qualify.

Question 2: Full ITC when Electricity is Used at Other Units

  • Held: Full ITC can be availed if the entire electricity produced is consumed captively at the cement plants.
  • As the solar plant and cement plants are under the same GST registration, and no electricity is sold or injected into the grid, ITC need not be apportioned under Section 17(1) or (2).

Question 3: Reversal of ITC on Unutilized Banked Energy

  • Held: If electricity banked with the grid remains unutilized after six months and is deemed sold to the ESCOMs (as per W&B agreement), it amounts to a supply of exempt goods.
  • Hence, the applicant must reverse proportionate ITC on such unutilized energy, as the energy is no longer used in the course of business and is instead an exempt supply.

Conclusion

This ruling provides significant clarity to businesses that generate their own electricity through renewable sources such as solar plants. It affirms the availability of ITC when the energy is used solely for business purposes, even if the power plant is located away from the main manufacturing site. However, it also establishes that any unutilized banked energy which lapses and is deemed sold to the grid is considered a supply of exempt goods, attracting ITC reversal.

The judgment reinforces the principle that “purpose of use and classification of goods/services” is central to ITC eligibility under GST.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular advisory and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.

Press On Click Here To Download Order File


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here