GST Vidhi | GST Advance Ruling


M/s Maarq Spaces Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru Vs. Karnataka Authority for Advance Rulings (Order No.: KAR ADRG…/2019)

GST On Development of Residential Plots by Developer Under JDA: AAR Analysis of Maarq Spaces Pvt. Ltd.

Background of the Case

M/s. Maarq Spaces Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in property development, entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) dated 08.11.2017 with certain landowners for developing their land into a residential layout. As per the agreement:

  • Revenue sharing was agreed at 75% for landowners and 25% for the applicant.
  • Cost of development was to be fully borne by the applicant.
  • The applicant entered into sale agreements with customers for the sale of developed plots.

Accordingly, the applicant approached the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) seeking clarification on the taxability under GST.

·       Order No.: KAR ADRG…/2019

·       Date of Order: 30.09.2019

·       Applicant: M/s Maarq Spaces Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru

·       Authority: Karnataka Authority for Advance Rulings

 

Questions Raised Before the AAR

1.    Whether the development and sale of land by the applicant under a Joint Development Agreement attract GST?

2.    If yes, whether Rule 31 of the CGST Rules can be applied to determine the taxable value of the supply?

Submissions by the Applicant

The applicant contended the following points:

On Taxability of Development and Sale of Land

  • As per Section 7(2)(a) read with Entry 5 of Schedule III of CGST Act, sale of land is neither a supply of goods nor services and hence not taxable under GST.
  • The sale of developed plots should also be treated as sale of land, even if development work is done, since development is naturally bundled and incidental.
  • The applicant claimed the transaction to be a composite supply where the principal supply is land, and hence no GST is applicable.

On Use of Rule 31 for Valuation

  • If the transaction is taxable, then valuation should be done under Rule 31 (residual method).
  • The applicant requested deduction of land value from total consideration using market value or cost-based estimation, treating only development charges as taxable.

Discussion and Analysis by the Authority

The AAR carried out a detailed analysis of the agreement and facts.

Nature of the Transaction

  • The applicant is not the owner of the land and has no title or possession rights over it.
  • The landowners are responsible for obtaining layout approvals, and the applicant is merely appointed to carry out development work.
  • The applicant’s share (25%) is not of land, but of revenue earned through sale of plots.

Key Observations from the Agreement

  • The applicant has expertise in development, not in land ownership.
  • The applicant executes civil development work, like roads, drainage, fencing, landscaping, etc.
  • The applicant bears the development cost and is compensated through revenue share from sale proceeds.
  • Sale consideration is deposited in an escrow account, and revenue is shared only after each sale.
  • The applicant does not receive any specific plots, only monetary compensation.
  • The arrangement is a service to landowners and not a sale of land by the applicant.

Conclusion on Question 1:

The applicant is not selling land, and the activity amounts to supply of service, which is liable to GST.

Ruling on Valuation Under Rule 31

As per Section 15 of the CGST Act:

The value of supply is the transaction value, i.e., the price actually paid or payable for the supply of goods or services.

 AAR’s View:

  • Applicant is paid 25% of the value of each plot sold — this amount is consideration for development services.
  • The entire 25% amount received is in money, not in kind or land.
  • Therefore, Rule 27–30 do not apply, and Rule 31 applies.
  • Rule 31 allows using reasonable means consistent with Section 15.
  • Since consideration is received progressively as sales happen, each payment received by applicant is fully taxable under GST.

Decision by the Authority

Question 1:

Yes, the activities undertaken by the applicant are supply of service and are liable to tax under GST.

Question 2:

Yes, Rule 31 is applicable. The value of supply is equal to the total amount received by the applicant, i.e., 25% of the market value of each plot sold.

Conclusion

This ruling provides a critical insight for real estate developers entering into JDAs. The development of land into plotted layouts for sale, where the developer is not the owner of the land, will be considered a supply of service. The entire revenue share earned by the developer will be treated as taxable consideration, and GST is applicable on such amount.

This ruling clears the misconception that sale of developed plots is exempt simply because it is "land". If development precedes sale, and developer is not the owner, then the transaction is not exempt and falls under supply of services.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular advisory and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.

Press On Click Here To Download Order File



Click here

Comments


Post your comment here