GST Vidhi | GST Advance Ruling


M/s. Deeraj Goyal Vs Andhra Pradesh Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) (AAR No. 08/AP/GST/2021 dated 18.01.2021)

GST Classification of Broker Services for Arranging Trucks for GTA (AAR No. 08/AP/GST/2021 dated 18.01.2021)

Introduction

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime brought clarity and uniformity in the taxation of services relating to transportation. However, practical complexities often arise when intermediaries operate between truck owners and Goods Transport Agencies (GTA). To address such doubts, an Advance Ruling was sought by M/s. Deeraj Goyal, an unregistered individual, regarding the GST classification and taxability of his services as a broker arranging trucks for GTAs. The Andhra Pradesh Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) delivered its decision through AAR No. 08/AP/GST/2021 dated 18.01.2021.
This article presents a detailed, easy-to-understand analysis of the ruling.

Background of the Case

The applicant, M/s. Deeraj Goyal, acts as an intermediary between truck owners and Goods Transport Agencies (GTA). His role is limited to identifying and arranging suitable trucks for a GTA whenever the GTA receives a transport contract from companies. In this system:

  • The GTA issues the transport tender and coordinates with the companies.
  • The applicant arranges trucks owned by different individual truck owners.
  • The applicant receives a commission, usually deducted from the amount paid to the truck owners.
  • In some cases, the GTA pays the truck owner directly, and then the truck owner pays the commission to the applicant separately.

The applicant does not own trucks, does not issue a consignment note, and does not transport goods himself. He only facilitates the connection between two parties.

Question Raised Before the AAR

The applicant sought clarity on the following issue:

Whether his activity of arranging trucks for GTA should be classified as:

1.    Transportation of goods by road (which is exempt),

2.    Commission agent services, or

3.    Goods Transport Agency services;
and what would be the correct HSN classification and turnover for GST purposes.

Applicant’s Interpretation

The applicant argued that:

  • He cannot be a GTA because he neither owns vehicles nor issues consignment notes.
  • He cannot be considered as providing the exempt service of transportation of goods by road since he does not conduct transportation on his own account.
  • He believed he should be classified as a commission agent, because the amount he retains is only a commission received from truck owners and not payment for transportation.

Thus, the applicant requested clarification about the correct tax classification.

Analysis by the Authority

1. Nature of Service Provided

The AAR observed that:

  • The applicant does not transport goods.
  • He only arranges trucks for GTAs.
  • His income is in the form of brokerage or commission.
  • He facilitates the supply of transport services between truck owners and GTAs.

Therefore, the applicant’s service is not the transportation of goods but a service of arranging and facilitating transportation.

2. Whether He Is an Intermediary

The AAR referred to Section 2(13) of the IGST Act, which defines an intermediary as:

“A broker, an agent or any other person… who arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or services… between two or more persons.”

Since the applicant arranges trucks (service) between truck owners and GTAs, he fits squarely within the definition of an intermediary.

3. Whether He Is an Agent

The definition of "Agent" under Section 2(5) of CGST Act includes brokers, commission agents, and other mercantile agents who handle business on behalf of others.
Because the applicant works on behalf of truck owners and receives a commission, he qualifies as an agent under GST law.

4. Whether Exempt Under Transportation of Goods by Road

The exemption applies only when a person directly transports goods by road (other than GTA).
The applicant does not transport goods himself; therefore, the exemption does not apply.

5. Whether He Is a Goods Transport Agency

A person becomes a GTA only if he:

  • Provides transport services, and
  • Issues a consignment note.

The applicant does neither; hence, he is not a GTA.

Classification & Tax Rate

The AAR concluded that the service provided by the applicant falls under:

HSN 9967 — Supporting Services in Transport

Specifically, Heading 9967(ii) under the category “supporting services in transport other than services of Goods Transport Agency”.

Under Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, this service attracts:

GST @ 18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST)

Turnover Clarification

The AAR clarified that the commission amount received by the applicant shall constitute his turnover under GST. It does not include the entire freight amount paid to truck owners; only the brokerage/commission income is his taxable turnover.

Final Ruling

The Authority ruled as follows:

  • The applicant shall be classified as an “Agent” providing supporting services for transportation of goods.
  • The appropriate classification is HSN 9967(ii).
  • The service is taxable at 18% GST.
  • The commission earned by the applicant will form his turnover for GST purposes.
  • The applicant is not a GTA and cannot claim exemption available to road transportation service providers.

Conclusion

The AAR ruling brings significant clarity to intermediaries engaged in arranging trucks for GTAs. The applicant is not considered a GTA nor a transporter. Instead, he is treated as a broker/agent providing supporting transport services, which are taxable at 18% GST.

 Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular advisory and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.

Press On Click Here To Download Order File



Click here

Comments


Post your comment here