GST Vidhi | GST Advance Ruling


M/s Rajendra Prasad Purshotam Vs. Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling (Ruling No.: RAJ/AAR/2026-27/06)

GST on Psyllium Seeds – Interpretation of “Fresh” Goods and Eligibility for Exemption

v Name of Applicant: M/s Rajendra Prasad Purshotam Moondra, Jeera Mandi Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan

v Ruling Authority: Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling, Goods and Services Tax

v Date of Ruling: 13.07.2026

v Ruling No.: RAJ/AAR/2026-27/06

Summary of Ruling

The applicant is engaged in the trading of Psyllium Seeds (Isabgol) purchased directly from farmers through APMC auctions. The applicant proposed to store the seeds in dry and ventilated godowns and thereafter supply them to Isabgol processing units without undertaking any processing such as drying, freezing, crushing, polishing or chemical treatment.

The applicant sought a ruling on whether such Psyllium Seeds would qualify as “fresh” Isabgol seeds and consequently be exempt from GST under Entry 87 of Notification No. 10/2025-Central Tax (Rate) dated 17.09.2025. Alternatively, the applicant sought clarification whether the goods would qualify as “goods of seed quality” under Entry 77 covering Chapter 12.

The Authority did not accept the applicant's contention that the goods would remain “fresh” at the time of supply. The Authority observed that the seeds would be stored in dry and ventilated godowns and that the period of storage was not specified. According to the Authority, such storage would result in drying of the seeds. Therefore, the goods could not be treated as “fresh” at the time of supply.

The Authority accordingly held that the Psyllium Seeds supplied by the applicant would attract GST under the applicable taxable entry rather than the exemption claimed by the applicant.

Relevant Sections / Notifications

The ruling primarily involves the following provisions:

  • Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 – specifies the questions on which an Advance Ruling can be sought.
  • Section 103 of the CGST Act, 2017 – provides for the binding nature of an Advance Ruling.
  • Section 104 of the CGST Act, 2017 – deals with situations where an Advance Ruling may be declared void.
  • Heading 1211 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – covers plants and parts of plants, including seeds and fruits, of a kind used primarily in perfumery, pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar purposes.
  • Notification No. 09/2025-Central Tax (Rate) dated 17.09.2025 – relevant for the taxable rate applicable to the goods.
  • Notification No. 10/2025-Central Tax (Rate) dated 17.09.2025 – provides the relevant exemption entries, including Entry 77 relating to goods of seed quality and Entry 87 relating to specified plants and parts of plants, including seeds, which are fresh or chilled.
  • Circular No. 163/19/2021-GST dated 06.10.2021 – considered by the Authority for understanding the distinction between fresh and dried agricultural products.

Submission by the Applicant

The applicant submitted that Psyllium Seeds (Isabgol) are an agricultural commodity obtained from the Plantago ovata plant and are purchased directly from farmers through APMC auctions.

The applicant explained that the farmers undertake normal agricultural activities such as cultivation, harvesting and threshing. Threshing merely separates the seeds from the plant and does not change the essential character of the agricultural produce.

After purchase, the applicant proposed to store the seeds in godowns and supply them to Isabgol processing units. The applicant specifically submitted that it would not undertake drying, dehydration, freezing, roasting, crushing, polishing, grading, milling, chemical treatment or any other processing.

The applicant further submitted that the seeds remain in the same natural condition from harvesting until their supply to the processing units.

It was also argued that there is no established commercial practice of trading in a separate commodity called “dried Isabgol seeds” or “frozen Isabgol seeds.” According to the applicant, Psyllium Seeds are ordinarily traded as harvested agricultural seeds and therefore should be regarded as “fresh.”

The applicant relied upon the relevant GST notifications and the CBIC clarification/FAQ concerning the classification and GST rate of Isabgol seeds and Isabgol husk.

The applicant therefore contended that the goods should qualify for exemption under Entry 87 of Notification No. 10/2025-Central Tax (Rate). Alternatively, the applicant claimed exemption under Entry 77 relating to “all goods of seed quality.”

Findings of the Authority

The Authority first examined the classification of Psyllium Seeds under Heading 1211 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

The Authority noted that Heading 1211 covers plants and parts of plants, including seeds and fruits, used primarily in perfumery, pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar purposes.

The Authority then focused on the principal issue—whether the Psyllium Seeds would remain “fresh” at the time of supply by the applicant.

The Authority observed that the applicant proposed to store the Psyllium Seeds in dry and ventilated godowns. Further, the applicant had not specified the period for which the goods would remain in storage before being supplied to the processing units.

According to the Authority, the purpose of storing agricultural produce in dry and ventilated godowns is to protect it from moisture and preserve it. However, such conditions would result in the goods becoming dry over the period of storage.

The Authority therefore held that the fact that the applicant did not intentionally undertake a separate “drying process” was not sufficient to establish that the seeds would remain fresh.

The Authority also considered Circular No. 163/19/2021-GST dated 06.10.2021, particularly the discussion concerning fresh and dried fruits and nuts. The Authority considered the principle contained in the Circular—that exemption applicable to fresh goods does not cover goods which have been dried in any manner or otherwise processed—to be relevant to the present case.

The Authority further observed that the applicant had not produced sufficient documentary evidence establishing the time between harvesting by the farmer and final supply by the applicant. In the absence of such evidence, the Authority was not satisfied that the seeds would continue to remain fresh.

Judgment / Decision of the Authority

The Authority rejected the applicant's contention that the Psyllium Seeds would qualify as fresh Isabgol seeds at the time of supply.

The important reasoning of the Authority was that:

1.    The goods were to be stored in dry and ventilated godowns.

2.    The applicant had not specified the period of storage.

3.    Agricultural produce naturally loses moisture during storage.

4.    The applicant had not produced sufficient evidence to establish that the seeds would remain fresh until the time of supply.

5.    The principles contained in Circular No. 163/19/2021-GST concerning fresh and dried agricultural products were considered applicable.

6.    Consequently, the goods could not claim the exemption available specifically to fresh or chilled goods under Entry 87.

The Authority thereafter examined Notification No. 09/2025-Central Tax (Rate) and Notification No. 10/2025-Central Tax (Rate) to determine the applicable GST treatment.

Conclusion:

The Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling concluded that the Psyllium Seeds (Isabgol) supplied by the applicant cannot be treated as “fresh” Isabgol seeds at the time of supply, primarily because the applicant proposed to store the seeds in dry and ventilated godowns and had not established the period of storage or demonstrated that the goods would continue to remain fresh.

Therefore, the applicant could not claim the exemption under Entry 87 of Notification No. 10/2025-Central Tax (Rate) on the basis that the goods were fresh or chilled.

The ruling is particularly important because the Authority has treated the condition of the goods at the time of supply, rather than merely the absence of an intentional drying process, as relevant for determining whether agricultural produce qualifies as “fresh.”

Disclaimer: All the Information  is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here