GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


M/s. Sastha Traders vs. The Superintendent GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court - WP No. 35770)

Case Name: M/s. Sastha Traders vs. The Superintendent GST and Central Excise

Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras

Judge: Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

Writ Petition No.: 35770 of 2023

Miscellaneous Petition No.: 35750 of 2023

Date of Judgement: 21 December 2023


Facts of the Case

M/s. Sastha Traders, represented by its partner M. Karuppasamy, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of their GST registration by the Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, Coimbatore. The GST registration was cancelled on 13 October 2023 due to the petitioner’s failure to file GST returns as required under Section 39(1) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Despite submitting a reply to the show cause notice issued by the respondent, the petitioner's response was allegedly not considered, and no opportunity for a personal hearing was provided before the cancellation.


Petitioner's Submission

The petitioner contended that the cancellation of their GST registration was unjust as their reply to the show cause notice was not taken into account by the respondent. They argued that the respondent failed to provide a personal hearing before issuing the cancellation order, violating principles of natural justice. Furthermore, the petitioner expressed their willingness to file all pending GST returns and comply with their tax obligations if the registration was restored.

Respondent's Submission

The respondent, represented by Senior Standing Counsel Mr. K. Mohanamurali, argued that the cancellation was due to the petitioner’s failure to file the requisite GST returns. The respondent maintained that if the petitioner filed their pending returns and paid the due taxes, interest, and penalties within a stipulated period, the cancellation could be reconsidered and appropriate orders would be issued in accordance with the law.

Judgement

Upon hearing both parties and examining the materials on record, the court found that the petitioner had not carried on any business during the relevant period and thus had not filed the necessary GST returns. However, the petitioner was now ready to comply with the requirements.

The court issued the following orders:

1.     The impugned cancellation order dated 13 October 2023 was set aside.

2.     The respondent was directed to reopen the GST portal within one week from the date of receipt of the court's order, allowing the petitioner to file their returns.

3.     The petitioner was instructed to file all pending GST returns and pay the tax liabilities, interest, and penalties within 30 days from the reopening of the portal.

4.     The court clarified that if the petitioner failed to comply with these directions, the cancellation order dated 13 October 2023 would be automatically restored.

The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and the connected miscellaneous petition was also closed. No costs were imposed.

 Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here