GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


JAL ENGINEERING VS. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY (Gujarat High Court: R/Special Civil Application No. 5040 of 2021)

CASE SUMMARY: JAL ENGINEERING VS. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY

R/Special Civil Application No. 5040 of 2021

Court: High Court Of Gujarat

Date: 16.12.2021

Case Overview:

The petitioner, JAL Engineering (represented by Partner Karishma Shaikh), filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions against the Union of India (represented by the Secretary) for the immediate sanction of refund of Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) paid on goods exported as zero-rated supplies.

Facts Of The Case:

JAL Engineering, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting valves, exported goods under shipping bills dated September 5, 2017 (SB No. 8465051 and 8459617) and September 14, 2017 (SB No. 8455069). The total IGST amount paid was Rs. 17,30,468.


Submission By Petitioner:

The petitioner claimed that the refund of IGST was withheld due to a technical error related to the claiming of higher rate duty drawback instead of IGST refund. They argued that both rates (higher and lower duty drawback) were at 2%, making the error negligible.

Submission By Respondent:

The Union of India, through its authorities, opposed the refund on the grounds that the petitioner had opted for a higher rate of duty drawback which precluded them from claiming IGST refund under the applicable notifications.

Court Finding and Ruling:

After hearing arguments from both sides, the Honorable Justices Sonia Gokani and Nisha M. Thakore disagreed with the respondents' stance. They referred to precedents, particularly the case of Amit Cotton Industries, where it was held that such technical errors should not prevent the rightful refund under IGST provisions if the rates involved were the same.

Conclusion:

The Court directed the respondents to sanction the refund of IGST to the petitioner, considering that the petitioner’s case fell within the provisions of Section 54 of the CGST Act and Section 16 of the IGST Act. The judgment emphasized that technical errors in claiming duties should not hinder legitimate refunds where applicable rates remain unchanged.

 

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here