GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


M/S. INDO SWISS GEMS CO. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (Calcutta High Court: W.P. No.: WPA 13141 of 2024)


Summary of Case:  M/S. INDO SWISS GEMS CO. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

 

 

Application No. W.P. No.: WPA 13141 of 2024

 

Date of Order: July 4, 2024

 

Court: Calcutta High Court

 

 

Facts of the Case:

·       The petitioner, M/S. Indo Swiss Gems Co., was engaged in job work and was penalized for not generating an e-way bill for the consignment. The petitioner argued that the consignment value did not exceed Rs. 50,000 and hence an e-way bill was not required.

 

Submission by the Petitioner:

·       The petitioner argued that the proper officer had incorrectly determined the value of the supply of goods based on the value of the goods rather than the transaction value for the job work.

·       The petitioner referred to a trade circular which stated that goods returned to the principal after job work only needed to be accompanied by a challan and not an e-way bill.

·       The petitioner requested that the penalty paid be refunded or adjusted against future GST levies, as there was no irregularity in not generating the e-way bill.

 

Submission by the Respondent:

·       The respondents argued that the petitioner’s submissions were not supported by proper disclosure and that the determination of the value of the goods was in accordance with Section 15 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. They contended that the petitioner failed to disclose the contract, which affected the proper determination of the transaction value.

 

Judgment:

·       The court found that neither the proper officer nor the appellate authority had considered whether the transaction value could be determined in accordance with Section 15(1) of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017.

·       The court set aside the order of the appellate authority dated December 27, 2023, and remanded the matter back for re-determination of the transaction value.

·       The petitioner was directed to disclose all relevant documents within three weeks for proper determination by the appellate authority.

 

Conclusion:

·       The writ petition was disposed of with directions for the petitioner to make necessary disclosures and for the appellate authority to re-determine the transaction value and pass a fresh order.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here