GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


Smartadmedia vs. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court: W.P.(C) 6517/2024 & CM. APPLS. 27222/2024)


Case Summary: Smartadmedia vs. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

 

Case Number: W.P.(C) 6517/2024 & CM. APPLS. 27222/2024

Order Date: May 8, 2024

Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

Summary of Case: The petitioner, Smartadmedia through its sole proprietor Navdeep Singh Sahni, sought a direction to the respondents to issue a refund of Rs. 9,69,017/- along with the due interest in terms of Section 54 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). The petitioner also requested guidelines for processing all pending applications and issuing refunds within 60 days, with interest to be paid in case of delays. 

Brief Facts of the Case:

·       The petitioner filed a refund claim on January 22, 2024.

·       No deficiency memo was issued to the petitioner by the respondents within the statutory period of 60 days.

 

Submissions by the Petitioner:

·       The petitioner argued that the statutory period for the issuance of a refund had elapsed.

·       The petitioner sought directions for the timely processing of the refund application.

 

Submissions by the Respondent:

·       The respondents acknowledged receipt of the notice and participated in the proceedings.

 

Findings and Decision:

·       The court referred to Section 54(7) of the CGST Act and Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

·       The court noted that the proper officers are mandated to comply with the provisions of the Act and the guidelines issued in the circular.

·       The court directed the proper officer to expedite the processing of the petitioner's refund application and dispose of it within two weeks, taking into account the relevant provisions of the Act and the circular.

 

Conclusion:

·       The petition was disposed of with directions to the proper officer to process the refund within the stipulated period.

·       The petitioner was given the liberty to seek further remedies if aggrieved by any order passed regarding the refund application and the claim of interest.

 

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here