GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


M/s. Central Government Employees Consumer Co-op Society Ltd. vs. Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax, Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court: W.P.(C) 3873/2024 & CM APPL. 15976/2024)


Case Summary: M/s. Central Government Employees Consumer Co-op Society Ltd. vs. Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax, Delhi & Anr.

 

Case No.: W.P.(C) 3873/2024 & CM APPL. 15976/2024

Order Date: 24 April 2024

Court: High Court of Delhi

 

Summary: The petitioner challenged the demand order issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act, arguing that the order was passed without considering their detailed reply and without providing a proper personal hearing.

 

Case Facts:

·       The show cause notice (SCN) dated 24.09.2023 proposed a demand of ₹17,89,56,282.00 against the petitioner.

·       The petitioner submitted a detailed reply on 20.10.2023 addressing all allegations with supporting documents.

·       The impugned order dated 31.12.2023 dismissed the reply as unsatisfactory without detailed examination and claimed that no proper reply or explanation was received despite opportunities given for personal hearing.

 

Petitioner's Submissions:

·       Argued that the SCN was addressed in detail, and the reply was comprehensive with supporting documents.

·       Claimed that the impugned order failed to consider the reply on its merits and lacked proper reasoning.

Respondent's Submissions:

·       Did not contest the factual scenario presented by the petitioner.

 

Court Findings and Judgment:

·       The court found the impugned order unsustainable as it did not consider the detailed reply or the supporting documents submitted by the petitioner.

·       The Proper Officer did not provide specific reasons or seek further clarifications from the petitioner if required.

Judgment:

·       Set aside the impugned order dated 31.12.2023 and remitted the SCN to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication.

·       Directed the petitioner to file a further reply within 30 days.

·       Directed the Proper Officer to re-adjudicate the SCN after giving a personal hearing and to pass a fresh speaking order within the prescribed period under Section 75(3) of the Act.

 

Conclusion: The petition was disposed of, emphasizing the necessity for proper consideration of replies and adherence to due process to ensure fairness.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here