GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


Dish TV India Ltd. vs. GST Officer, Ward-209, New Delhi & Others (Delhi High Court: W.P. (C) 5475/2024, CM APPL. 22567/2024 & CM APPL. 22568/2024)


Case Summary: Dish TV India Ltd. vs. GST Officer, Ward-209, New Delhi & Others

Case No.: W.P. (C) 5475/2024, CM APPL. 22567/2024 & CM APPL. 22568/2024

Date of Order: 16.04.2024

Court Name: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

 

Summary of the Case: Dish TV India Ltd. challenged the order dated 30.12.2023, which demanded a sum of Rs. 77,80,646.00 under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner claimed that their detailed replies to the show cause notice were not considered, and the order was passed without proper evaluation.

 

Facts of the Case:

·       Dish TV India Ltd. received a show cause notice dated 30.09.2023 proposing a demand for Rs. 77,80,646.00.

·       The petitioner filed detailed replies on 26.10.2023 and 06.11.2023.

·       The impugned order was passed on 30.12.2023 without considering these replies.

 

Submission by Petitioner:

·       The petitioner argued that their detailed replies and supporting documents were not taken into consideration.

·       They claimed that the impugned order was cryptic and did not address the merits of their submissions.

 

Submission by Respondent:

·       The respondents contended that the petitioner failed to deposit the tax/interest amount or provide a plausible explanation within the stipulated time.

·       They argued that sufficient opportunities were given to the petitioner to clarify the deficiencies.

 

Findings and Judgement of the Court:

·       The court found that the impugned order did not sustain because it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents provided by the petitioner.

·       The Proper Officer did not seek any further clarifications or details from the petitioner.

·       The court set aside the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 and remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication.

·       The petitioner was given 30 days to file a further reply, and the Proper Officer was directed to pass a fresh speaking order after giving an opportunity of personal hearing.

 

Conclusion: The case was disposed of with directions to the Proper Officer to re-adjudicate the matter considering the petitioner's submissions and following the principles of natural justice.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here