![]()
Case Summary: Spinclabs Private Limited vs. The Commissioner of
Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Others
Case No.: W.P.(C)
4187/2024
Court: High
Court of Delhi at New Delhi
Date of Order: April
10, 2024
Summary of the Case: Spinclabs
Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated December 31,
2023, issued by the tax authorities under Section 73 of the Central Goods and
Services Tax Act, 2017. The orders were based on show-cause notices dated
September 5, 2023, and September 29, 2023, which proposed a tax demand of
₹42,74,423 and ₹33,32,254, respectively, including penalties.
The petitioner argued
that they had provided detailed replies to these show-cause notices, along with
supporting documents and calculations. Despite this, the tax authorities passed
the orders without adequately considering the petitioner's submissions, leading
to cryptic and unsatisfactory orders.
Submissions by the
Petitioner:
The petitioner contended
that their replies to the show-cause notices were comprehensive and included
all necessary supporting documents. They argued that the tax authorities failed
to apply their minds to the content of these replies, resulting in unjust and
poorly reasoned orders.
Submissions by the
Respondent:
The respondent maintained
that the petitioner’s replies were unsatisfactory, lacking comprehensive
documentation and reconciliation of the claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC). They
argued that the petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to justify their
claims, which led to the imposition of penalties.
Findings by the Court:
The Delhi High Court
found that the tax authorities did not properly examine the detailed
submissions made by the petitioner. The court observed that the orders were
issued without a thorough consideration of the petitioner's replies and
supporting documents. Furthermore, the court noted that if additional
information was required, the tax authorities should have specifically
requested it from the petitioner.
Decision and Conclusion:
The Delhi High Court set
aside the impugned orders dated December 31, 2023, and remitted the matter back
to the proper officer for re-adjudication. The court directed the petitioner to
submit their replies to the show-cause notices within 30 days and instructed
the tax authorities to re-adjudicate the case, ensuring a fair hearing and a
fresh, reasoned order. The court clarified that it had not commented on the
merits of the case, leaving all rights and contentions of the parties open for
consideration in the re-adjudication process.
Disclaimer: All the
Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the
Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the
authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the
basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.
Click here
