GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


Anita Bansal Proprietress of M/S A.B. Enterprises vs. The Union of India & Anr. (Delhi High Court : W.P.(C) 4520/2024 )


Case Summary: Anita Bansal Proprietress of M/S A.B. Enterprises vs. The Union of India & Anr.

Case No.: W.P.(C) 4520/2024  

Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi  

Date of Order: April 8, 2024

Summary of the Case: Anita Bansal, the petitioner, challenged an order dated December 30, 2023, issued by the tax authorities under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The order was based on a show-cause notice dated September 23, 2023, which proposed a tax demand of ₹21,11,088.00 including penalties. The petitioner did not respond to the show-cause notice, leading to an ex-parte order being passed.

Submissions by the Petitioner:

The petitioner explained that she could not respond to the show-cause notice because her husband was seriously ill and later passed away on December 20, 2023. Due to these personal circumstances, the petitioner was unable to attend to the legal proceedings during that period.

Submissions by the Respondent:

The respondent's order stated that the petitioner had failed to provide a reply or explanation within the stipulated time, despite multiple reminders and opportunities for a personal hearing. Consequently, the order was passed ex-parte.

Findings by the Court:

The Delhi High Court found that the petitioner was justified in her failure to respond to the show-cause notice due to the serious illness and subsequent death of her husband. The court noted that the order had been passed solely on the grounds of non-response, without considering the petitioner's exceptional personal circumstances.

Decision and Conclusion:

The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned order dated December 30, 2023, and remitted the matter back to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. The court directed the petitioner to file a reply to the show-cause notice within 30 days. The Proper Officer was instructed to re-adjudicate the case, ensuring a fair hearing and a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with the law. The court clarified that all rights and contentions of the parties remained open for consideration in the re-adjudication process.


Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here