GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


M/s Sri Murugan Traders Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Harur Circle, Dharmapuri, Hosur (Madras High Court : W.P. No. 22314 of 2024)

                                                                               

Case Summary : M/s Sri Murugan Traders Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Harur Circle, Dharmapuri, Hosur

Case No.: W.P. No. 22314 of 2024

Date of Order: 13th August 2024

Name of Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras

 

Summary of the Case: The petitioner, M/s Sri Murugan Traders, challenged an order passed by the Commercial Tax Officer concerning tax demand issues related to SIM card sales for BSNL. The petitioner contended that a detailed reply had been submitted but was not considered by the respondent, leading to an impugned order that violated natural justice principles. The court set aside the order and remitted the matter for reconsideration.

Facts of the Case:  

1. The respondent issued Form GST DRC-01 on 28th December 2023 for the financial year 2018-19, raising two tax issues.

2. The petitioner submitted a detailed reply on 10th April 2024, which was uploaded in the GST portal on 12th April 2024.

3. The respondent passed an order on 23rd April 2024, stating that the petitioner did not file any reply and confirmed the demand.

Submission by Petitioner:  

The petitioner argued that their detailed reply, filed on 12th April 2024, was not considered by the respondent. The impugned order was passed without granting an opportunity for a personal hearing, as required under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, leading to a violation of natural justice.

Submission by Respondent:  

The respondent acknowledged that the petitioner had filed a reply but claimed that the petitioner did not address the two specific defects raised. However, the respondent expressed willingness to comply with any court order.

Findings and Judgement of Court:  

The court found that the respondent passed a non-speaking order without considering the detailed reply submitted by the petitioner. This was a violation of natural justice, and the court set aside the impugned order. The case was remitted back to the respondent, who was directed to consider the reply and pass a speaking order on merits.

 

Conclusion:  The court quashed the impugned order dated 23rd April 2024 and remitted the matter to the respondent for reconsideration. The respondent was instructed to consider the petitioner's reply and issue a speaking order in accordance with the law.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here