GST Vidhi | GST Case Law


M/s Auto Industries v. State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court)

Non-Filling of Part-B of E-Way Bill Is a Procedural Lapse, Not Tax Evasion: Allahabad High Court

Introduction

In a significant judgment protecting genuine taxpayers from harsh penal consequences due to procedural errors, the Allahabad High Court has quashed a penalty order passed under Section 129(3) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. The case titled M/s Auto Industries v. State of U.P. and Another (Writ Tax No. 2457 of 2025) involved the non-filling of Part-B of the e-way bill, which the authorities treated as a violation warranting seizure and penalty.

The Court held that in the absence of any finding on tax evasion, mere non-filling of Part-B constitutes a technical breach and cannot attract penalty under Section 129, citing its consistent view in similar cases.

Case Details

  • Case Title: M/s Auto Industries v. State of U.P. and Another
  • Case Number: Writ Tax No. 2457 of 2025
  • Court: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Chief Justice's Court)
  • Order Date: 29 May 2025

Background of the Case

The petitioner, M/s Auto Industries, was transporting goods through the state of Uttar Pradesh when the vehicle was intercepted at Jewar Toll by the Mobile Squad. The vehicle was accompanied by an e-way bill; however, Part-B of the e-way bill (containing transport details) was found to be unfilled.

The Assistant Commissioner, Sector 5 (Mobile Squad 5), Gautam Buddha Nagar, issued a notice and later passed an order dated 13 May 2025, imposing a penalty under Section 129(3) of the UP GST Act solely on the ground of non-compliance with Rule 138 of the GST Rules, 2017.

Arguments by the Petitioner

  • The petitioner submitted that non-filling of Part-B was a technical lapse and not an intentional act to evade tax.
  • It was argued that the authority did not record any finding indicating an attempt to evade tax, which is a mandatory precondition for invoking Section 129.
  • Reliance was placed on the precedent set by the Allahabad High Court in M/s Precision Tools India v. State of U.P. & Others, Writ Tax No. 415 of 2023, decided on 29 January 2024, where it was held that penalty cannot be imposed unless intention to evade tax is established.

Stand of the Respondent

  • The State's counsel admitted the non-filling of Part-B but defended the imposition of penalty on the basis that the required documents were incomplete, making the movement non-compliant.
  • However, the State could not deny that the High Court had consistently held in prior rulings that absence of tax evasion intent negates the need for penalty under Section 129.

Observations of the Court

The Division Bench of the High Court made the following key observations:

1.    The only ground cited in the penalty order was the violation of Rule 138 due to non-filling of Part-B of the e-way bill.

2.    No specific finding was made by the Assistant Commissioner about any attempt to evade tax.

3.    Referring to a consistent line of judgments, including Precision Tools India, the Court reiterated that mere procedural infractions do not justify penal actions without evidence of tax evasion.

Judgment

Based on the above findings, the High Court passed the following directions:

  • The penalty order dated 13.05.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Sector 5 (Mobile Squad 5), Gautam Buddha Nagar is set aside.
  • The writ petition is allowed.
  • The vehicle and goods detained are to be released immediately to the petitioner.

Conclusion

The Allahabad High Court’s judgment in M/s Auto Industries is a welcome reiteration that procedural non-compliance should not lead to punitive consequences in the absence of tax evasion. It offers clarity and comfort to taxpayers engaged in bona fide business activities and underscores the need for balanced GST enforcement that upholds both the letter and spirit of the law.

Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular advisory and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.

Find the Attachment (Press on Click Here )


Click here

Comments


Post your comment here