GST Show Cause Notice Quashed as Central Tax Authorities Cannot
Initiate Parallel Proceedings for Same Tax Period Already Adjudicated by State
GST Authorities
M/s Best Corrugators v. Union of India & Others / High Court
of Karnataka / Date of Judgment: 7 January 2026 / Writ Petition No. 12655 of
2024 (T-RES)
Introduction
of the Case
The present case was
decided by the High Court of Karnataka in a writ petition filed by M/s Best
Corrugators challenging the validity of a show cause notice issued by the
Central GST authorities. The main issue before the Court was whether the
Central Tax Department could initiate proceedings for the same tax period when
the State GST authorities had already completed adjudication for that very
period.
The case involved the
question of jurisdiction and legality of parallel proceedings under the GST
regime. The Court examined whether duplication of proceedings by different GST
authorities for the same assessment period was permissible under law.
Facts of
the Case
M/s Best Corrugators, a
partnership concern engaged in business activities at Mysuru, had already
undergone adjudication proceedings before the State GST authorities for the
financial year 2017-18. An adjudication order had been passed on 26.12.2023 by
the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes relating to the said tax period.
Subsequently, despite
completion of the adjudication proceedings by the State GST authorities, the
Central Tax Department issued a show cause notice dated 27.03.2024 for the very
same financial year 2017-18. Aggrieved by the issuance of the notice, the petitioner
approached the High Court challenging the validity of the proceedings initiated
by the Central authorities.
The petitioner contended
that once the State GST authorities had already adjudicated the matter for the
relevant period, initiation of fresh proceedings by the Central GST authorities
for the same tax period was without jurisdiction and contrary to law.
Submissions
by the Petitioner
The petitioner argued
that the State GST authorities had already completed assessment and
adjudication proceedings for the financial year 2017-18 and had passed a final
order on 26.12.2023.
It was submitted that
after such adjudication, the Central GST authorities could not again initiate
proceedings for the same tax period. According to the petitioner, parallel
proceedings by two separate GST authorities for the same subject matter and same
assessment year were impermissible and amounted to lack of jurisdiction.
On this basis, the
petitioner sought quashing of the show cause notice issued by the Central Tax
Department.
Submissions
by the Respondents
The counsel appearing for
the Central Tax Department fairly submitted before the Court that the
contention raised by the petitioner could not be disputed. The respondents did
not seriously oppose the plea raised by the petitioner regarding prior adjudication
by the State GST authorities for the same tax period.
Analysis
and Judgment of the Court
The High Court considered
the adjudication order already passed by the State GST authorities for the
financial year 2017-18. The Court also took note of the submission made by the
counsel appearing for the Central Tax Department.
After examining the
facts, the Court held that once adjudication proceedings had already been
completed by the State GST authorities for the relevant tax period, issuance of
another show cause notice by the Central GST authorities for the same period
was unsustainable.
Accordingly, the High
Court set aside the show cause notice dated 27.03.2024 issued by the Central
Tax authorities.
The Court further noted
the submission of the petitioner that certain documents had been collected by
the Central Tax authorities during the course of proceedings pursuant to the
impugned show cause notice. The Court directed the Central authorities to verify
the same and return the documents collected from the petitioner, if any.
With these directions,
the writ petition was disposed of.
Conclusion
The judgment in M/s Best
Corrugators v. Union of India & Others is an important ruling on the issue
of parallel GST proceedings. The High Court clarified that once adjudication
for a particular tax period has already been completed by one GST authority,
another authority cannot initiate fresh proceedings for the same matter and
same period. The decision reinforces the principle that duplication of
adjudication proceedings under GST law is not permissible and that authorities
must act within the limits of their jurisdiction. The ruling also provides
protection to taxpayers from repeated proceedings for the same assessment
period by different tax authorities.
Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular advisory and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.
Click here
