Composite GST Show Cause Notice Issued for Multiple Tax Periods Quashes
and Sets Aside - Karnataka High Court
Priyadarshini Charitable Trust v. State Tax Authorities / High
Court of Karnataka / Date of Judgment: 2026 / W.P. No. 6854 of 2025
Introduction
of the Case
The Karnataka High Court
in Priyadarshini Charitable Trust v. State Tax Authorities dealt with the
legality of a composite show cause notice issued under the GST law covering
multiple tax periods and financial years in a single proceeding.
The petitioner challenged
the show cause notice, adjudication order, and consequential proceedings on the
ground that the GST authorities had illegally clubbed several tax periods
together in one notice. The dispute primarily revolved around whether such
consolidation of multiple financial years and tax periods in a single show
cause notice was permissible under the CGST/KGST Acts.
The judgment is another
important ruling following the landmark decision of the Karnataka High Court in
M/s Pramur Homes and Shelters v. Union of India, where the Court had
categorically held that clubbing or bunching of multiple tax periods in one
show cause notice is invalid and contrary to the statutory scheme of GST law.
Facts of
the Case
Priyadarshini Charitable
Trust filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court challenging the
show cause notice dated 16.12.2022, the Order-in-Original dated 09.01.2025, and
the consequential Form GST DRC-07 dated 31.01.2025 issued by the GST authorities.
The impugned show cause
notice covered tax periods extending from October 2017 to October 2019, while
the adjudication proceedings related to the period from July 2017 to March
2020.
The petitioner contended
that the GST authorities had issued a single composite show cause notice by
combining multiple tax periods and financial years into one proceeding, which
was contrary to law and already declared invalid by the Karnataka High Court in
earlier judgments.
Submissions
by the Petitioner
The petitioner argued
that the issue involved in the present case was directly covered by the
judgment of the Karnataka High Court in M/s Pramur Homes and Shelters v. Union
of India and other connected matters.
It was submitted that the
Court had already held that clubbing, consolidation, bunching, or combining
multiple tax periods, financial years, or block periods in a single composite
show cause notice is illegal and impermissible under the GST law.
The petitioner therefore
contended that since the show cause notice in the present case also combined
several tax periods extending over different years, the notice itself was
defective and all consequential proceedings were liable to be quashed.
Submissions
by the Respondents
The Revenue authorities
defended the proceedings initiated against the petitioner. However, the Court
mainly examined the controversy in light of the binding precedent already laid
down in M/s Pramur Homes and Shelters and similar cases decided by the Karnataka
High Court.
Analysis
and Judgment of the Court
The Karnataka High Court
examined the show cause notice issued in the present case and noted that it
related to multiple tax periods spanning from October 2017 to October 2019,
while the adjudication proceedings extended from July 2017 to March 2020.
The Court observed that
the controversy involved in the petition was identical to the issue already
decided in M/s Pramur Homes and Shelters v. Union of India, where the High
Court had categorically held that clubbing or combining multiple tax periods and
financial years in one composite show cause notice is invalid and illegal.
The Court specifically
referred to its earlier findings that:
“clubbing/consolidation/bunching/combining
of multiple tax periods/financial years/block periods in a Single/Composite
Show cause notice” is impermissible under law.
After examining the
impugned notice and adjudication order, the Court held that the show cause
notice issued to the petitioner was defective because it combined several tax
periods into one proceeding. Consequently, the adjudication order passed on the
basis of such defective notice could not survive in law.
Accordingly, the High
Court set aside the Order-in-Original dated 09.01.2025, Form GST DRC-07 dated
31.01.2025, the show cause notice dated 16.12.2022, and all consequential
proceedings initiated against the petitioner.
However, the Court
reserved liberty in favour of the GST authorities to initiate fresh proceedings
in accordance with law, if permissible. The Court also clarified that all
contentions of the parties on merits were kept open.
Conclusion
The judgment in
Priyadarshini Charitable Trust v. State Tax Authorities further strengthens the
legal principle laid down by the Karnataka High Court against issuance of
composite GST show cause notices covering multiple financial years or tax
periods.
The ruling reiterates
that GST authorities must strictly follow the statutory framework while
initiating proceedings under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST/KGST Acts and
cannot combine several tax periods into one notice. The Court also reaffirmed
that if the foundational show cause notice itself is defective, all
consequential adjudication and recovery proceedings arising from such notice
are liable to be quashed.
The decision provides
significant procedural protection to taxpayers and emphasizes adherence to
principles of legality and proper adjudication under the GST regime.
Disclaimer: All the Information is based on the notification, circular advisory and order issued by the Govt. authority and judgement delivered by the court or the authority information is strictly for educational purposes and on the basis of our best understanding of laws & not binding on anyone.
Click here
